Community Standards

The rules of tone, posture, and subject for Trendzion comments.

Version 1.0 · Last revised 2026-04-18

Trendzion is a community devoted to the spoken and written words of leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Discussion here should reflect that devotion — not as a loyalty test, but as an editorial frame that keeps the conversation grounded in reverence for the source material and for one another.

These standards are the basis on which every comment is reviewed. They are not rules of belief — you are not required to agree with the Church to post here. They are rules of tone, posture, and subject.

The nine pro-positions

We are, publicly and unapologetically:

  1. Pro Latter-day Saints — respectful of members, missionaries, leaders, and lay.
  2. Pro Zion — honoring the gathering, the covenant community, and the shared aim of a consecrated people.
  3. Pro life — affirming the sanctity of human life at every stage.
  4. Pro modesty — in dress, speech, and intent.
  5. Pro service — volunteer labor, ward and stake participation, quiet acts, the ministry.
  6. Pro charity — helping the poor and needy; the first and greatest public expression of our faith.
  7. Pro Jesus — Christ as the Redeemer and the Head of the Church.
  8. Pro God — Heavenly Father, the plan of salvation, and reverence for Deity.
  9. Pro celebration — joy in faith, joy in community, joy in the good news.

What we do not allow

Posts that violate the community standards fall into these categories:

What happens when a post violates these standards

Trendzion uses two views: Liberty (the default) and Captivity (moderator-flagged).

Captivity view exists because removing these comments entirely felt dishonest — they are part of the community conversation. Making them visible only behind a deliberate maturity gate felt like the right compromise. Trendzion does not host unsafe content in either view.

Appeal and edit

If your post is masked or moved to Captivity, you may edit it. The edit goes to a human moderator review queue. There is no SLA and no automated re-opening. A moderator reviews and either restores your comment to Liberty, keeps it masked, or deletes it. This is intentional: the editing path exists so you can make your argument again, better; it does not exist as a retry loop.

Banning

Repeated violations revoke posting privileges. A banned user can still read. Past comments remain where they are (masked stays masked, clean stays clean). We do not retroactively hide the history of a banned user — accountability matters.

Who enforces these standards

Version and change history

This document is version-controlled alongside the site code. Every change ships through review; the live site renders the canonical copy at /community-standards.html.